Monthly Archives: January 2008

Practical ways to avoid 13 common RCRA violations

The following is a list of common hazardous waste violations that have been cited by many state agencies. This article provides you with some simple and practical ideas you can put in place in order to avoid or minimize the chance that you will have these violations.   

Violation #1. Failure to mark containers with the “Hazardous Waste” label.          

Solution: You need to assign one person in charge of putting the label on the container before any waste is put into it. This applies to both central storage area and Satellite Accumulation Points (SAP). SAP is storage locations at or near your production line where you can accumulate up to 55 gallons of hazardous wastes. Also make sure you have a steady supply of labels on hand. Remember that some states (such as California) require state compliant labels. So be sure to order the right ones from your supplier. 

Violation #2. Having more than 55 gallons of hazardous waste at the Satellite Accumulation Point (SAP). The regulations allow you to store up to 55 gallons of hazardous waste at the point of generation provided that the operator has control over the waste.

Solution: Make sure your operator understands the legal requirements and have him check the waste volume on a regular basis. By law, the operator is required to be “in control” of the SAP. In other words, he has to know what type of wastes can go into the container and make sure that no other wastes are placed in it. 

Violation #3. Failure to mark the accumulation start date on the Hazardous Waste Label.

Solution: Put up a sign on the wall of the accumulation (storage) area to remind personnel to put the date on the label when the first drop is placed in the container. This information should also be included in your weekly inspection checklist. Include this item in your staff meeting discussion. 

Violation #4. Exceeding the storage time limit: 90 days for LQG (Large Quantity Generator) or 180 days for SQG (Small Quantity Generator)       

Solution: Make it a practice to ship your wastes out every 2 months (for LQG) and every 4 months (for SQG). Keep in mind that the less wastes you have on-site, the less chance you will have a spill or accident. If you are a SQG and you decide to ship your wastes to a licensed facility located more than 200 miles away, the federal regulations allow you to extend your SQG storage time limit to 270 days.    

Violation #5. Failure to keep hazardous waste containers closed at all times.

Solution: The term “closed’ means leak proof and vapor tight. You should put up reminder notices in the accumulation area and conduct regular briefing for your employees to make sure they are aware of this legal requirement. This is particular critical if you have a high personnel turnover rate at your facility. Remember that if you are storing highly volatile hazardous wastes and you fail to keep the container closed at all times, you could be charged with conducting “treatment” on site without a permit since reducing the volume of waste by way of evaporation could be considered by the regulatory agencies as “treatment”.  

Vioaltion #6. Using improper or damaged containers to accumulate wastes.

Solution: Make sure this is one of the items to be checked on your weekly inspection checklist. Replace any damaged container as soon as possible. 

Violation #7. Failure to inspect hazardous wastes accumulation area on a weekly basis.

Solution: Keep your weekly inspection checklist as simple as possible. Do not make it so cumbersome and tedious to use that no one will want to use it. Have a set of procedures in place to make sure that any deficiencies identified in the weekly checklist are corrected. The best way to ensure this is done is to review the weekly checklist for follow-up actions on a regular basis. Another way to avoid this violation is to ship your wastes directly from the Satellite Accumulation Points and not use the central storage area at all. There is no Federal legal requirement for weekly inspection at SAPs.

Violation #8. Failure to update the RCRA Contingency Plan for LQG.                   

Solution: Assign a specific individual the responsibility of updating the plan. Make sure the emergency coordinator identified in the Contingency Plan review the plan on a regular basis. If there is a change in personnel – such as plant manager or emergency coordinator – make sure the plan is updated right away.   

Violation #9. Failure to provide adequate hazardous waste training.

Solution: Be aware that all new employees who are going to be handling hazardous wastes must receive initial training within 6 months and cannot handle hazardous wastes without supervision. All experienced employees must receive annual refresher training. Remember that the main purpose of the training is to make sure your employees understand the basis concept of waste identification and emergency response requirements that are specific to your plant. Design your training program specific to the job function of the employee. The three basis requirements of hazardous waste training are: (1) Tell your employees who is in charge in case of emergency; (2) Tell them what to do in an emergency; and (3) Tell them how to do it. 

Violation #10. Failure to maintain training record.

Solution: Make sure all employees sign off on the attendant sheet after any training session. Even if you just show your employees a short video tape of hazardous waste management, have them sign the attendant sheet. Be sure that the employee’s job description reflects the actual hazardous waste handling responsibility. 

Violation #11. Failure to properly identify hazardous wastes.

Solution: . In general, if the waste material is ignitable (a flash point of less than 140 degrees F) , corrosive (outside the pH range of 2 and 12, reactive (unstable or tend to explode) or toxic (according to EPA’s Toxic Characteristics Leaching Procedures) , it is a hazardous waste. Also if the waste has been listed by EPA as one of the four categories of listed wastes (F, K, P or U wastes), it is by definition a hazardous waste. You can identify hazardous wastes either by generator’s knowledge or laboratory testing. For example, if you use ignitable solvents in your operations, chances are you are generating an ignitable spent solvent as hazardous waste. There is no need for you to do chemical analysis on that waste. If you have doubts about your waste, test it and document it. Most common problems encountered are with floor sweepings, wipes, filters, etc. Be aware that some states have what they call non-RCRA wastes. These are wastes that are not considered to be hazardous under federal rules but are considered to be hazardous by state regulations. Always check your state regulations. 

Violation #12. Manifest records incomplete, erroneous or not readily accessible.

Solution: Make sure you staple the signed return copy from the TSDF and the Land Disposal Restriction forms together with your original copy; Be sure to keep all your manifests at one central location. This makes it much easier for an agency inspector to go through your manifests in a timely fashion without having to search all over the plant to locate copies of the manifest. If you have your waste hauler prepare your manifest for you, keep in mind that you are still legally responsible for the accuracy and truthfulness of your manifests. If the manifests contain numerous errors or hand written corrections made by the driver, it may be time for you to find a different company to handle your waste shipment. 

Violation #13. Failure to provide secondary containment for your waste storage area. (This is a violation under state regulations in certain states).

Solution: Although the federal regulations do not require you to have secondary containment at your central storage area, some states (such as Pennsylvania) require it under state laws. Always check with your state and local agencies to see if such requirement exists in your state. As a general rule, it is good management practice to have secondary containment for your waste storage area even if it is not required by federal or state regulations.


rcra-orientation-manual-2006-cover.jpgFor a FREE copy of EPA’s RCRA Orientation Manual and other useful compliance tips, click here. For our practical one-hour webinar on hazardous waste management, click here.


Asbestos removal company supervisor sentenced for illegal practices

According to US EPA, Branko Lazic, 42, of Haledon, N.J., was sentenced January 11 in federal court in Philadelphia for the illegal removal of asbestos pipe insulation at a Pennsylvania elementary school. U.S. District Judge Juan R. Sanchez sentenced Mr. Lazic to three years probation, including six months home confinement, $6,097 in restitution, $100 special assessment, and 50 hours community service in the Ambler, Pa. area.

    Lazic was the supervisor on an asbestos removal job performed in June 2002 at the Mattison Elementary School in Ambler. Lazic and his company were responsible for the removal of more than 600 asbestos-insulated pipe elbows located in the ceilings throughout the school. The job required that the asbestos insulation be removed in accordance with the Clean Air Act. An information filed in the case on June 6, 2007, alleged that on the weekend of June 29, 2002, asbestos was improperly removed. Lazic failed to ensure that asbestos was properly removed when he permitted another person to supervise the asbestos removal on the first floor of the elementary school, knowing that there was a high probability that the asbestos removal under this person’s supervision would be done without adequately wetting the asbestos.An investigation by the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office – Environmental Crimes Section and EPA’s Criminal Investigation Division discovered that instead of using the required removal equipment and techniques, asbestos-insulated elbows were removed without proper containment and with no water to suppress airborne asbestos particles. Lazic pleaded guilty to criminal violations of the Clean Air Act on June 14, 2007.

    The Clean Air Act requires work practice safeguards in asbestos removal and renovation projects to prevent the release of asbestos fibers into the air. Asbestos is a known carcinogen, and inhalation of asbestos fibers can cause serious health risks. Using water and equipment, such as glove bags, and other containment measures, prevents the release of asbestos fibers and minimizes the chance of exposure.

    Dry asbestos chunks and fibers were found several months after the removal. As a precaution the school district voluntarily shut down the school until follow-up inspections and air monitoring confirmed that the building could be safely reoccupied.

    The case was prosecuted by the Environmental Crimes Section of the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, with assistance provided by EPA’s mid-Atlantic regional office.

Storm water enforcement action by EPA and California

EPA Region 9 and the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board conducted on-site audits of City of Los Angeles’ and City Long Beach’s municipal storm water programs and conducted 55 individual storm water inspections of port tenants in May 2007.

As a result of this effort, on November 9, 2007, EPA issued an audit report and 20 Administrative Orders to facilities at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach for being not in compliance with California’s Industrial General Permit.

One of the facilities was cited for:

  1. Not identifying a pollution prevention team in its storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP)
  2. Not maintaining sampling records of monthly visual storm water discharge observation
  3. Not adequately implementing Best Management Practices (BMP) as identified in its SWPPP. In this case, the facility lists good housekeeping as a BMP. And yet the EPA inspectors observed significant amount of trash and white material on the ground at a location that drains toward the storm drain. There were also evidence of tank overfilling and spillage of glycol and latex paint.

These are common violations for many SWPPPs because facilities often ignore the written plans and fail to IMPLEMENT them. It is very easy for an inspector to look at the written plan and compare it to reality. More often than not, the written words and reality fail to match.

The issuance of 20 Administrative Orders by EPA is convincing proof that the agencies always LOOK for evidence of implementation when it comes to environmental plans such as SWPPP. It is NOT sufficient to just hire some consultants to prepare a nice looking plan for you. You have to actually do what the consultants have put into the plan.

So always manage your consultants and make sure they don’t put something in your plan that you can’t implement. Remember: they get paid whether you implement the plan or not. Work with the consultants and your staff who will be implementing the plan to make sure your staff has ownership of that plan.  

Without ownership, it is likely no one will implement the plan.

Hazardous Waste Violations

On January 7, 2008, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued a press release saying that it has fined Admiral Transportation of City of Industry, Calif., $15,000 for violating federal hazardous waste regulations. The violations uncovered by EPA during an inspection in April 2006 included: 

  • Failure to comply with labeling requirements for containers of hazardous wastes;
  • Storage of hazardous waste without a permit for a period exceeding 90 days;
  • Failure to close hazardous waste containers;
  • Failure to submit biennial reports;
  • Failure to conduct weekly inspections of hazardous waste areas;
  • Failure to properly dispose of hazardous waste.

These are very common hazardous waste violations. Click here for a list of the 13 most common RCRA violations and practical ways you can avoid them. Note that EPA cited the facility for storing hazardous wastes without a permit because the facility exceeded its storage time limit of 90 day. The RCRA regulations are exemption based. You are allowed to do certain things (such as storing hazardous wastes on-site) without the need for a RCRA permit as long as you comply with certain conditions (such as not storing them for more than 90 days if you are a large quantity generator). So as soon as this facility exceeded the storage time limit, the exemption became invalid and it was operating a Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF) without a permit. 

Another violation was on failure to conduct weekly inspection of the waste storage area. This too is a very commonly cited violations. One way to ensure compliance with this requirement is to make sure your weekly checklist is simple to fill out and the person who is responsible for doing it has some ownership of it. Make sure that person understands why this must be done every week. And if you discover any discrepency during your inspection, make sure you have a procedure to correct these problems in a timely fashion. Here is a sample checklist that is simple. 

Note that it is rather unusal for EPA Region 9 to be involved in enforcement action in California. The common practice is for the local agencies to get involved first. There may have been other circumstances that led to EPA’s involvement.